MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-20-2001, 04:32 PM   #1
David Fulford
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 193
Post 1.6 roller rockers

I bought some 1.6 roller rockers and plan on putting them on soon. I was told that the increase in lift wouldn't be enough to worry about. I've got the Ford GT-40 crate motor with GT-40 iron heads and the E-303 cam(.498 lift). Is there any danger with putting the 1.6 roller rockers on as far as piston to valve clearance. I was told they would increase my lift by 30 thousands.
David Fulford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2001, 10:18 AM   #2
Dark Knight
Registered Member
 
Dark Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Az
Posts: 854
Cool

1.6 is the stock ratio... you mean 1.7's?

------------------
84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer
3.55's, underdrives stock shorties
stock cam, 1.7's
14.06@100.21, 255RWHP on a hot day
265 on the mph/weight chart

Dark Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2001, 11:01 AM   #3
David Fulford
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 193
Post

Well I bought the 1.6 rockers. If they don't increase lift I guesss that's OK, or maybe I'll sell them and put the 1.7s on.
Is it the 1.7s that increase lift and could I safely put them on. Thanks for the info.
David Fulford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2001, 05:21 PM   #4
Dark Knight
Registered Member
 
Dark Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Az
Posts: 854
Cool

shouldnt be a prob with the 1.7's.. probably not worth the extra $$$ though


------------------
84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer
3.55's, underdrives stock shorties
stock cam, 1.7's
14.06@100.21, 255RWHP on a hot day
265 on the mph/weight chart

Dark Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2001, 08:48 PM   #5
thunderbolt
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 380
Post

You might be getting confused with chevy. They use 1.5 stock ratio so 1.6 is a popular swap for more lift. Ford uses 1.6 stock (sb windsor motors) so 1.7 is then used for more lift.
thunderbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2001, 11:57 PM   #6
Y2KGT
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 21
Post

I had a friend that ran the 1.7 Rockers in his 95 GTS with an F303 cam with no problems. I don't remember the lift of the F cam, but its supposed to be the most radical of the motorsport cams.

------------------
2000 GT -- Black, 5sp, Mach460, Bassani CatBack & X-Pipe, MAC Cold Air, 70mm TB, Tri-Ax Shifter
1966 Mustang Coupe -- Tahoe Turquoise, Pony Int, A-Code, C4 Auto
------------------
scott@pearland.com
Y2KGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2001, 08:24 AM   #7
Gearhead999
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
Post

If you already have the 1.6 I wouldn't buy another pair to go to 1.7. I don't think it would be worth the money.
Gearhead999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roller rockers for stock heads QuantumMotorsports Windsor Power 1 07-14-2003 03:15 PM
Roller Rockers, bad? HiFlow5 0 Windsor Power 1 04-14-2002 01:35 PM
roller rockers bobtodd Windsor Power 4 04-07-2002 01:34 PM
reg rockers or roller rockers?? Chevysucks Windsor Power 1 12-05-2001 08:17 PM
Valve Springs & Roller Rockers StreetStang37 Windsor Power 4 04-17-2001 03:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.


SEARCH