MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Website Community > Blue Oval Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-20-2004, 02:41 PM   #1
88GT 5pt0
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 73
Default Buying a new Mustang...5.0 or 4.6?

Well I have decided to sell the 88 5.0, even though I love it, I want something newer. I'm looking for a 94-98 model. I want to know which is the better engine the 94-95 5.0 or the 96-98 4.6. Which is faster stock? which is easier/cheaper to mod? It will be my summer daily driver and it probably wont see the track more than once or twice a year (for now) but I would like to be able to smoke anyone on the street.
__________________
My Cardomain Website
88GT 5pt0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 04:01 PM   #2
Mr 5 0
Conservative Individualist
 
Mr 5 0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
Lightbulb Re: Buying a new Mustang...5.0 or 4.6?

Originally posted by 88GT 5pt0 :

Quote:
Well I have decided to sell the 88 5.0, even though I love it, I want something newer. I'm looking for a 94-98 model. I want to know which is the better engine the 94-95 5.0 or the 96-98 4.6. Which is faster stock? which is easier/cheaper to mod? It will be my summer daily driver and it probably wont see the track more than once or twice a year (for now) but I would like to be able to smoke anyone on the street.
Since the 5.0 engine was last offered in a Mustang in 1995, you're stuck with a '94 or '95 model if you go the 5.0 route.

The term 'better engine' is a relative one with a lot of factors to consider. The 5.0 V-8 has been proven to be reliable over the years and it's a more simple design (pushrods vs overhead cam) with lots of reasonably-priced go-fast parts available for it, as you must know. Most stock 5-speed 5.0's run in the mid-to-high14 second range but can easily be modified with steeper rear gears, head, intake and exhaust upgrades and of course, a blower or nitrous for that big kick. A 13 second 5.0 is not hard to find and 12-second 5.0's are fairly plentiful, too, although they usuallly have nitrous or a blower pushing the power.

I'm less familiar with the 281 (4.6 liter) Mustang engine but I recall the early ones ('96 -98) were generally judged to be dogs, compared to the 5.0. The later models ('99-up) seem to have been improved a lot and are faster - but also more expensive. Of course, again, nitrous will make anything 'faster' if you want to go that route.

On balance, I would go for a 94-95 5.0-powered Mustang. The engine is better, it's going to be a lot cheaper and you still have the newer body style. As for 'smoking anyone on the street' - that's a fantasy unless you have an 11-second Mustang. Late model Corvettes, Camaro-Firebirds and assorted much-modified riceburners and turbo-powered foreign cars are quite capable of 13's and even 12's in some cases. Of course, a well modified Mustang 5.0 can run in that pack too, but a stocker is only going to be a 14-second car and while that can beat a lot of non-nitroused ricers and guys driving Mom's Honda Accord, it won't 'smoke' a lot of the more serious cars out there. The good news is that it will have the potential to do so, if you want to modify it and even if you don't, your Mustang V-8 will be a lot more fun to drive than some screaming ricemobile blowing smoke out of it's farting 4" exhaust tip. After all, you'll be driving a Mustang; an American automobile legend with a proud history and a good old V-8 engine, just the way God intended.

Good luck in your search.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner
1990 - 2005
Mr 5 0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 04:18 PM   #3
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default

Get the 96-98 stang if you like losing races and going slow.

Get the 94-95 stang if you want to be able to go fast, cheap.

JMO,
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 07:12 PM   #4
SMOKE
Old School ROUSH
 
SMOKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Stockbridge, GA
Posts: 531
Cool

Well, I guess I can provide the counter point to the general opinion.

If the choice is between the 4.6 SOHC and 5.0L of the 94-95s ..... then everything thing being equal it will depend on preference.
If you're familiar with the Windsor history and packages .... the 5.0L is the easy choice.
The 96-98 SOHC motors are down in power by comparison to the 99+ brothers but for $1500 in parts (PI swap) you're right at the same level of power.

PI cars with cams are putting down 250rwhp.

True you can go fast cheap with the 5.0L but the 4.6 has proven it's no slouch with similar mods.
SMOKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 08:11 PM   #5
Crazy Horse GT
Registered Member
 
Crazy Horse GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sale Creek, TN. C. S. A.
Posts: 4,652
Default

well, im down to my 95 5.0, but my 00gt was faster, the 96-98 4.6's, had a intake & bad head design, i have modded my 95 vert some, but the few mod's i did too my 00gt, it was faster, but, i havent done alot of mod's to my 5.0 YET, i have a 69 model 302, which is much faster, but it's been punched out some, but, still sitting around, till i get money to build the falcon. if you get a 96-98, get 99+ heads & intake, makes a big difference.
__________________
95 gt vert, lot's of stuff, it aint slow.

04 sonic blue v - six my beater
89 rs camaro iroc turbo hood, other stuff, my wifes ride
84 lx stang cammed up 289 hi po, etc
65 falcon, maybe by the year 2020.

black 00gt, gone but never forgotten.

R H C- member # 1
o.b.c. da prez- member # 1 if your under 40 dont ask.
goodbye for now odie,r.i.p. 11-27-03
Crazy Horse GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 02:30 AM   #6
thdrcat
Registered Member
 
thdrcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 100
Default

Apples and oranges from what i understand. I would go with the pushrod motor because that is what i was raised on and what i know.

another thing to think about is that 4.6 parts can get expensive. from my understanding both motors have potental, but the 4.6 is "newer" so that means it's parts get marked up ~20%.

Have a buddy that is into the awd dodge stealth's. AWD, twin turbo, dual overhead cam, etc.

it just does not float my boat. at this time his car beats mine left and right, but when you gun his, you can not feel the body torque up, etc.

same reason han solo kept the falcon i guess.
thdrcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2004, 03:36 PM   #7
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Crazy Horse GT
well, im down to my 95 5.0, but my 00gt was faster, the 96-98 4.6's, had a intake & bad head design, i have modded my 95 vert some, but the few mod's i did too my 00gt, it was faster, but, i havent done alot of mod's to my 5.0 YET, i have a 69 model 302, which is much faster, but it's been punched out some, but, still sitting around, till i get money to build the falcon. if you get a 96-98, get 99+ heads & intake, makes a big difference.
Throw a heads/cam/intake package on your 5.0 and you will think damn my 00 GT was sloooow
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2004, 08:48 PM   #8
88workcar
Registered Member
 
88workcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
Cool

Keep the 88. If I had the extra cash, I would buy you a car and take the 88 to warm loving home. SPEED DENSITY LIVES FOREVER
__________________
88workcar
1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft
Rice Hater # 42
To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid I'm somewhere in tthe middle.
88workcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2004, 08:02 PM   #9
RBatson
Registered Member
 
RBatson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1997
Posts: 3,028
Default

If you are dead set on a different car.. you might want to check the prices on the 94-98 Cobras, some are priced surprisingly low. As far as 5.0 vs 4.6.. tough one.
RBatson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2004, 08:16 PM   #10
lx mike
Undescribable
 
lx mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Ft Myers Fla
Posts: 1,539
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dark_5.0
Throw a heads/cam/intake package on your 5.0 and you will think damn my 00 GT was sloooow
don't forget the gear!
__________________
Rice Haters Club Member #101
lx mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2004, 08:55 AM   #11
HonestAl
Registered Member
 
HonestAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 97101
Posts: 47
Default 2v 4.6< 5.0 <4v 4.6

If you can afford a 96-98Cobra, go that way, if not I'd stick w/pushrod power; the only downside to the 5.0 is the block gets shakey when you start making real HP, the 4.6 block will take more power but will cost a lot more to make it.
HonestAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I need tips when buying a used mustang... pepe_la_pew15 Windsor Power 4 06-28-2004 08:19 PM
t-5, is it the same in the 4 cylinder and V8 ex-lt1-guy Windsor Power 12 03-03-2002 01:59 AM
buying a mustang need help nikolas d Windsor Power 24 02-22-2002 10:56 AM
89-Mustang pulling trailer -vs- 2000 Mustang Five0 Stang Stories 7 04-01-2001 02:50 AM
Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me. Taqus Blue Oval Lounge 3 01-17-2001 02:39 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM.


SEARCH