MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-25-2001, 10:42 AM   #1
A Wild Neg
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 26
Post 351W or 351C?

I have found all sorts of Windors 351 blocks I can buy from people. My dad and I are looking to put a 351 in my mustang 5.0 which is already fast. He is saying go with the Cleveland, they are much better engines. Any suggestions? Are their alot of performance parts for the 351 I can get to beef it up to run 10s/9s? Or do I stick with my high 10/low 11 302? And work with that? I can get either or. I have a guy holding a 351c and a 351w for me.

- Kevin
A Wild Neg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2001, 11:44 AM   #2
DirtKing
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: brooklyn center,mn,USA
Posts: 169
Post

there are alot more aftermarket parts for the windsor, not to mention kits for installing it in the late model body. The cleveland is a good motor, but costly to build. You can make ALOT of power with the windsor fairly easily.

------------------
88LX notch, Speedpro EFI Procharged!
DirtKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2001, 02:24 PM   #3
Dark Knight
Registered Member
 
Dark Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Az
Posts: 854
Cool

http://www.kaufmannproducts.com/mustangs.htm
even have serpentine adapters... heheh

------------------
84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer
3.55's, underdrives stock shorties
stock cam, 1.7's
14.06@100.21, 255RWHP on a hot day
265 on the mph/weight chart

Dark Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2001, 03:35 PM   #4
NO SLO PK
Registered Member
 
NO SLO PK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
Post

Up until the 1980s, the 351W was considered inferior to the 351C, since the Cleveland had better flowing heads and a racing heritage. But nowadays, there's a huge availability of performance heads, cams, intakes, and headers for the Windsor. I also agree, it's cheaper to build a Windsor.

Given the availability of parts for the Windsor, it just doesn't make sense to stay with the old school thinking of running a Cleveland. You can tell your dad I said that, and tell 'em I've owned both engines .

------------------
Russ L
'91 LX
Procharger, 3 row intercooler, extrude honed Cobra intake, Mac full Length Headers, 30# inj., 73mm C&L, 75mm tb, E303 cam, 289 rods, ported E7 heads, MSD, T-Rex w/255 lph Walbro, 5 lug conversion, Cobra R wheels, 3.27 gears and Moser Axles.
NO SLO PK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
351C vs 351W stvneil Windsor Power 3 02-29-2004 10:25 AM
351W heads on 289 stock engine sleeperstang Classic Mustangs 5 11-21-2002 08:35 PM
NEED HELP ASAP !351W to 351C Swap IeatZ28 Classic Mustangs 2 11-06-2001 12:45 AM
HP #'s from a built 351W versus FMS 351 versus stroker stroker393 Windsor Power 0 03-09-2001 10:24 AM
351W vs 351C Five0 Windsor Power 2 01-26-2001 08:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM.


SEARCH