 
                    
                  
                    © Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
                    
                  
                MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|  12-16-2001, 03:56 PM | #1 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Feb 1999 Location: Smithton, IL, US 
					Posts: 215
				 |  Cold compression test? How much of a difference will I get in ta cold test compared to a warm test.  I did the test with the intake off and a broken valve spring so I could not start the car and warm it up. I know that a warm motor will better seat the rings, but I had a wierd reading. 1 160 2 175 3 175 4 175 5 145 6 150 7 150 Wet 1 150 2 175 3 175 4 175 5 160 6 160 7 175 I find it wierd that that the drivers side is worn more than a passenger. And number 1 compression went down on the wet test? Know before I added the top end I and never removed the valve covers. With cobra intake and basic bolt ons I ran a best of 13.6 @100 mph and 13.80's all day. I would not think if I had this compression problem the car would run so good. 
				__________________ 92 GT 5-speed Windsor Jr,E303,1.7RR,Cobra intake,65mm TB,155lph,24 lbs,75mm MAS,shorties,h-pipe, 2.5 flowmaster,Black magic,Holley adj fuel, 3.73 No times yet. 13.6 before heads,cam,inj,rr www.fordmustanggt.com | 
|   |   | 
|  12-17-2001, 03:30 AM | #2 | 
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 1999 Location: Ventura, California 
					Posts: 8,981
				 |   Those numbers are very inconsistant. I'm suspicious of the gauge. There is no way that a cylinder will lose compession by adding oil. I also find it odd that there is so much cylinder/ring wear on one side and not on the other. I would recommend borrowing a quality gauge from someone and trying it again. Take care, -Chris 
				__________________ Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local RED & WHITE! | 
|   |   | 
|  12-17-2001, 09:15 PM | #3 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Feb 1999 Location: Utica, Michigan 
					Posts: 2,631
				 |   I agree. Oil will always raise the number unless you have a wasted valve. Usual 5.0l compression numbers are around 160 psi. 
				__________________ 1988 Mustang GT stock bottom 302, C4 10.9 @ 128 with 8 psi of Novi 1000 boost!----STOLEN 1989 Mustang notchback Warmed up 306 with a Procharger. | 
|   |   | 
|  12-17-2001, 09:47 PM | #4 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Feb 1999 Location: Smithton, IL, US 
					Posts: 215
				 |   Thanks guys I figured something was wrong. The gauge I have is new and it is a ATD cylinder compression gauge. Anyway I got my springs today and will try and install them tomorrow. I will do another test once I get it running.  Thanks for the help guys. 
				__________________ 92 GT 5-speed Windsor Jr,E303,1.7RR,Cobra intake,65mm TB,155lph,24 lbs,75mm MAS,shorties,h-pipe, 2.5 flowmaster,Black magic,Holley adj fuel, 3.73 No times yet. 13.6 before heads,cam,inj,rr www.fordmustanggt.com | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Attn: PKRWUD: Compression Test Results | 95mustanggt | Windsor Power | 13 | 06-22-2004 07:34 AM | 
| Looking to buy and I need Advice...Fuel Pressure Test Gage and Compression Test Gage | MTU 50 | Windsor Power | 3 | 10-18-2002 05:34 PM | 
| How to do a compression test | mustangLX92 | Windsor Power | 2 | 06-24-2002 07:22 AM | 
| Compression test numbers | Chipdog | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-02-2001 08:18 PM | 
| Compression test... | Red96GT | Modular Madness | 1 | 12-03-1999 01:49 PM | 
 
                    
                  