MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-27-2002, 09:09 AM   #1
Mach 1
Registered Member
 
Mach 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
Default pushrod vs. O/H cammer RPM ranges

Most of us are aware of the tendency of overhead cam engines to have less torque down low and make their horse power higher up in the RPM range, and that pushrod engines will make more torque down low and make their horse power lower in the rpm range.

What I am wondering is WHY?

How does cam placement affect these characteristics?
__________________
2002 GT
1993 GT (SOLD)
'93 Mustang GT
RHC member #142
Mach 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2002, 12:03 PM   #2
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

Don't quote me, but my understanding is it's all about where the engine can make the most power reliably. An OHC engine will be reliable at higher rpms than a pushrod engine for the simple fact that there are less moving parts between the cam and the valves. The more parts involved, the more physics plays a limiting part in the potential. That being said, the engineers that design the charachteristics of the camshafts do so accordingly. For higher horsepower, a higher rpm power band is preferred, so the engineers would design the cam so that it helps to develop the power band in the highest rpm range that is considered reliable. Since OHC engines have a higher reliable rpm range, it follows that that is where there peak power will be found. Since it's difficult to design a cam that provides power from off idle through redline, there is bound to be a weaker range as well as a stronger range. Since the OHC stronger range is higher than the pushrod engines, it makes sense that their lower rpm range would be less powerful. For example, let's say, for illustration purposes, that the cam has a power range of 4000 rpms, with the strongest point in the middle. If your engine has a reliable rpm range peak of 6000 rpms, you would design the cam to come in at 2000 rpms, peak at 4000 rpms, and peter out at 6000 rpms. The range from zero to 2000 rpms would be considered it's weakest point. Now, if you took a cam with that same 4000 rpm range, and put it in an engine with a reliable rpm range peak of 8000 rpms, you would design it so that it came in at 4000 rpms, peaked at 6000 rpms, and petered out by 8000 rpms. This would make it's range from zero to 4000 rpms it's weakest point. Thus, the first engine, with a lower reliable rpm range peak, would get it's power at a lower rpm than the engine with a higher reliable rpm range.

Make any sense?

Take care,
~Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2002, 01:46 PM   #3
Mach 1
Registered Member
 
Mach 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
Default

makes sense, but even cammer engines with a red line, or RPM operating range that is the same as a pushrod engines, still make thier power higher up. I am comparing engines of different dispalcements though. What you said makes sense.

later
__________________
2002 GT
1993 GT (SOLD)
'93 Mustang GT
RHC member #142
Mach 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM Engines BLOCKER Blue Oval Lounge 2 04-13-2004 12:35 AM
Speed Secret # 3 jim_howard_pdx Windsor Power 13 11-09-2002 10:35 AM
Edelbrock RPM Package jim_howard_pdx Classic Mustangs 2 10-28-2002 04:57 PM
Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package jim_howard_pdx Windsor Power 0 10-27-2002 01:10 AM
RPM difference between 3.73 to 4.10 o2superstang Modular Madness 0 07-09-2002 06:58 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.


SEARCH