Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
07-27-2002, 09:09 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
|
pushrod vs. O/H cammer RPM ranges
Most of us are aware of the tendency of overhead cam engines to have less torque down low and make their horse power higher up in the RPM range, and that pushrod engines will make more torque down low and make their horse power lower in the rpm range.
What I am wondering is WHY? How does cam placement affect these characteristics? |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
| Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
| Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 10-28-2002 04:57 PM |
| Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 0 | 10-27-2002 01:10 AM |
| RPM difference between 3.73 to 4.10 | o2superstang | Modular Madness | 0 | 07-09-2002 06:58 PM |