Cylinder Head Poll

Five0 · 05-13-2001, 10:10 PM

I also have the canfield heads and yes I would get them again if I were in the market for some heads again.

MM&FF had an article on a lot of heads in one of the issues and they said that the canfields made about the same torque but made 8 more hp than the tfs heads. I have been told the canfields are too big for the 302 and are better suited for a bigger motor or forced induction but they still work well on the 302.

I have ran a best of a 12.5 @109. And that was with the wrong fuel system (EFI fuel pump and fuel lines with a carbed setup) and A bad syncro in third gear; and I do not power shift because of the stock t-5).

I got them at excessive Fuckups... I mean motorsports. I would not get them from those people.

The fuel system is in and I have installed a NOS system so I will get some better #'s soon. I hope to be close to 11's on motor.

If I had to get a head other than canfield I would go with AFR.

------------------
James Cox
nochevy@hotmail.com
1991 Mustang LX
12.565 @109.38mph 1.764 60ft

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Rocker adjustment	zach0	Classic Mustangs	3	04-24-2004 12:28 PM
Pulling cylinder head tips	Hozer 88GTConv	Windsor Power	2	03-04-2004 03:05 PM
After all normal bolt-ons... cylinder head questions	RED92LX50	Windsor Power	9	06-14-2003 08:43 AM
289 cylinder head on 5.0L????	FiveORacer	Windsor Power	2	05-16-2001 04:02 PM
Cylinder Head Swap	Fostang	Windsor Power	0	05-05-2001 09:51 PM

05-13-2001, 10:10 PM	#12
Five0 Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: middleburg, fl, usa Posts: 1,134	I also have the canfield heads and yes I would get them again if I were in the market for some heads again. MM&FF had an article on a lot of heads in one of the issues and they said that the canfields made about the same torque but made 8 more hp than the tfs heads. I have been told the canfields are too big for the 302 and are better suited for a bigger motor or forced induction but they still work well on the 302. I have ran a best of a 12.5 @109. And that was with the wrong fuel system (EFI fuel pump and fuel lines with a carbed setup) and A bad syncro in third gear; and I do not power shift because of the stock t-5). I got them at excessive Fuckups... I mean motorsports. I would not get them from those people. The fuel system is in and I have installed a NOS system so I will get some better #'s soon. I hope to be close to 11's on motor. If I had to get a head other than canfield I would go with AFR. ------------------ James Cox nochevy@hotmail.com 1991 Mustang LX 12.565 @109.38mph 1.764 60ft