View Single Post
Old 04-30-2002, 08:13 PM   #7
slow98
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: draper,va,us
Posts: 206
Post

you right im wrong, power curves do suggest 410s would be better... i still ran right beside a 2000 thousand gt with 410s and basically the same mods as me - the maf and + his clutch, in the 8th,time slips were less than a 10th apart in most cases,but i admit based on power curve u are right and i am wrong

1987-1992 gt 225hp @4200 rpm
300lbs ft @3200 rpm

1996-1997 gt 215hp @4400 rpm
285lbs ft @3500 rpm

1998 gt 225hp @4750 rpm
390lbs ft @3500 rpm

1999-curr. gt 260hp @5250 rpm
302lbs ft @4000 rpm

not a huge difference in power curve but peak torque at 4000 rpm does suggest 410...sorry i got confused guys...peace

GO FOR 410s
__________________
1998 mustang gt/manual..373s,bbk offroad h pipe,flowmaster cat back,c&l 80 mm maf,steeda triax,eibach springs,steeda ud pulleys,upr timing adjuster,screamon demos coil packs,motorsports 9mm plug wires,steea aluminum lca's,steeda heavy duty uca's and just over 100 k on the clock
slow98 is offline   Reply With Quote