MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

stangGT95 · 01-26-2005, 07:14 PM

I can't say 100% sure but when I ran the electronics from the '98 and the '95 (just used the 80mm housing from the '98) the car ran fine and the voltage from the o2's were pig rich for both and that was before the KB SC. Saving for a tweecer and 42's so I can drop the FMU. I've heard 2 different stories: 1) tables are in the sensor & 2)they're in the ECU. If anything the car felt stronger w/ the '98 sensor and it was just as rich as the '95 electronics were now the sensor may not had been as dirty as the stock but still.

01-26-2005, 07:14 PM	#5
stangGT95 Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Novinger, Mo Posts: 72	Re: '95 cobra mass air I can't say 100% sure but when I ran the electronics from the '98 and the '95 (just used the 80mm housing from the '98) the car ran fine and the voltage from the o2's were pig rich for both and that was before the KB SC. Saving for a tweecer and 42's so I can drop the FMU. I've heard 2 different stories: 1) tables are in the sensor & 2)they're in the ECU. If anything the car felt stronger w/ the '98 sensor and it was just as rich as the '95 electronics were now the sensor may not had been as dirty as the stock but still. __________________ 95 GT w/ AODE and Transgo Shift kit, trans cooler, SpeedCal, KB 1.5 Flowzilla w/ 6# pulley, MAC chrome CAI, chrome radiator hoses, stock MAF w/ center post removed, 70mm PP TB, electrical boost & FP gauges, digital A/F gauge, 1 5/8" unequal headers, 2 1/2" ProChamber h-pipe, Borla catback exhaust, and 3.55's. Cobra RR hood, Saleen double wing, Xenon body kit, chrome Cobra R wheels 17X8 in front and 17X10.5 in the back.