MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post - cobra or gt-40?

Unit 5302 · 10-14-2001, 02:43 PM

Could it be, have I riled Mach 1 out of his bomb shelter that he's been hiding in recently? LOL

I understand where you are coming from with the 10cfm, but according to the people talking dyno numbers the Explorer is right with the other two. I honestly am having a hard time believing there is as much difference between the manifolds as that flowdata is showing, but if that is the case, you are right. 10cfm is worth noting. That's a little less than the difference between those shitty Edelbrock heads and the kick *** Trick Flow's. HEHEHE. Just for some info, on average the stock intake flows 136. That's quite a bit less than the stock heads, but slapping just an intake onto a stock 5.0 won't do a whole lot for you. The GT-40 irons and P's flow right about the same on the intake side. Between 190-195cfm.

I may actually let you win this arguement.

10-14-2001, 02:43 PM	#14
Unit 5302 Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 5,246	Could it be, have I riled Mach 1 out of his bomb shelter that he's been hiding in recently? LOL I understand where you are coming from with the 10cfm, but according to the people talking dyno numbers the Explorer is right with the other two. I honestly am having a hard time believing there is as much difference between the manifolds as that flowdata is showing, but if that is the case, you are right. 10cfm is worth noting. That's a little less than the difference between those shitty Edelbrock heads and the kick *** Trick Flow's. HEHEHE. Just for some info, on average the stock intake flows 136. That's quite a bit less than the stock heads, but slapping just an intake onto a stock 5.0 won't do a whole lot for you. The GT-40 irons and P's flow right about the same on the intake side. Between 190-195cfm. I may actually let you win this arguement.