© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
07-14-2001, 08:45 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: KC,Mo,US
Posts: 70
|
G- tech
Does anyone know how acurate these things are?
I borrowed one from a friend and I've been running low 14's most of the time. But I have ran a 13.4 and a few 13.7's. My tires suck and the time I ran the 13.4 it felt like I launched almost perfect. Has anyone ever compared it at the track? ------------------ 95gt 80k, MSD 6AL, MSD coil, pulleys, fpr, cold air kit, off road h-pipe, flowmasters, 3.73, fluidampener, 9mm wires, mega bite jr lowers, kennybrown subframe connectors, edelbrock performer intake, 70mm TB, Aluminum Driveshaft, Tri-Ax shifter. |
07-14-2001, 01:57 PM | #2 |
RICE taste like Chicken
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 687
|
13.4 is too fast....13.7 is more like it.
If you miss the level by much, it will throw it off big time. Mph is higher always on G-Tech. ------------------ Dustin Saleenized 89 GT,428 rwhp,TFS Street Heat Intake,TFS TW Heads,TFS #2 cam,BD-11A 9 psi,FRPP 1.6 rr's,BBK 70mm TB,Pro-M 75mm Bullet,MSD 6BTM, FMS 9mm wires,BBK longtubes,BBK Short H-pipe,American Thunder cat back,3.55's 12.3@119 http://www.mustangworks.com/rides/pictures/Listing1549-slot1.jpg |
07-14-2001, 03:52 PM | #3 |
The Dude
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,262
|
I believe that the g-tech is pretty accurate as far as the ET goes, but on MPH its a little higher, because it measures the velocity (speed) at the end of the run, whereas the track measures how quickly you cover the last 60 ft of the track.
|
07-15-2001, 04:03 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: KC,Mo,US
Posts: 70
|
You are probably right. I went to the track today and I had a pass were I ran a 14.6 and the g-tech said I ran a 13.9 then I ran a 14.4 and it said I ran a 15.10. But like you said I don't think I had it perfectlly level.
------------------ 95gt 80k, MSD 6AL, MSD coil, pulleys, fpr, cold air kit, off road h-pipe, flowmasters, 3.73, fluidampener, 9mm wires, mega bite jr lowers, kennybrown subframe connectors, edelbrock performer intake, 70mm TB, Aluminum Driveshaft, Tri-Ax shifter. |
07-15-2001, 12:06 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
|
I think you need a better mount for it to work properly. It never really snugs up to the window like it should. That's the biggest flaw it has. I'm trying to fabricate a better one.
------------------ 351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible |
07-16-2001, 04:11 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Schaumburg, IL, USA
Posts: 31
|
I think mounting it is the biggest problem it has. I have used my one at the track and it has someitmes matched my times, but as others have said mph is always off. I could care less if it is accurate, as long as it gives me #s that say I am faster then when I did my mod, it makes me happy
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tech? | Maroon91LX | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 03-04-2004 11:32 PM |
02 extentions--website for Interactive Tech? | Jason Van Holland | Windsor Power | 6 | 01-25-2001 02:07 PM |
Atlanta Tech Results | George Klass | Racer's Club House | 1 | 04-23-1999 08:44 PM |