
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Walker, MI, USA
Posts: 1,202
|
A X-pipe will be about 1-3HP better. As for sound many poeple dont like it as well as the H-pipe.
Here is my car mostly stock with a X-Pipe and Edelbrock RPMS for Muffers.
__________________
Engine: steel mounts, Under drive pulleys, K&N, GT-40 Intake ported Lower, No power steering, No A/C, Mac cold intake, 65MM TB, 255 Fuel pump, 24's, AFR 165 58cc, Rocker Arms 1.7with the stock Cam, 1 5/8 short headers, offRoad X-pipe Drive Train: 3.55, T-5 with a Pro 5.0 shifter 12.656@107.71MPH See It at www.T-racing.com/mustang.htm |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| bbk unequals and stock H pipe :( | scale | Windsor Power | 4 | 06-14-2002 11:41 AM |
| California Smog legal X or H pipe | shawv | Modular Madness | 1 | 05-08-2002 05:51 PM |
| Off road pipe vs. Catalitic Pipe | Kamaro Killer | Windsor Power | 7 | 04-04-2002 04:05 AM |
| Mac H pipe w cats vs BBK x pipe with cats?? | Chevyguy | Windsor Power | 15 | 11-16-2001 08:34 AM |
| looking for an x pipe for a 93 stang with an aod?? | bad93gt | Windsor Power | 0 | 02-28-2001 03:41 PM |
