

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dover, DE
Posts: 70
|
![]() Fordmuscle.com did a shoot-out between all the popular heads out there and one thing that I was VERY suprised at was the GT-40X heads. They tested the to flow 235 CFM (at .7 lift on the intake side) and 167 CFM (at .6 lift on the exhaust). That compared to the Edelbrock Performers (215 CFM intake at .6 lift, 179 CFM exhaust at .7 lift) was interesting. And then compared to TFS heads, (242 CFM intake at .6 lift, 198 CFM exhaust at .7 lift) they are not much worse. They didn't test AFR heads. Does anyone now what the numbers on the AFR heads (out of the box) are?
__________________
-- -1991 LX 5.0 Sedan, 5 spd (new 'Z' tranny), 3.73, aluminum DS, Hedman headers, 190 LPH, MAC CAI, Flowmaster catback. (170K miles on motor) Best ET: 14.434 @ 96.04 MPH - 2.205 60' (Radials) My Notch |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help I need heads!! | SmokinStangGT | Windsor Power | 18 | 05-04-2003 10:05 PM |
New FRP Heads for 96 - 98 4.6 | surfbeast | Modular Madness | 9 | 11-21-2002 07:02 PM |
will 99-2002 cams out of the pi heads fit in the 96-98 stock heads | slow98 | Modular Madness | 6 | 10-25-2002 04:28 PM |
GT-40 heads | 5.0 Pony | Windsor Power | 1 | 09-10-2002 10:26 PM |
Which heads are beter? | patman | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 12-02-1999 03:42 AM |