

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
|
![]() The point I was trying to make is that you don't get something for nothing. I've seen other messages here where people just can't understand why they can't go any faster. One guy is even dropping his EFI to go with a carb thinking that the EFI is holding him back.
They start with a stock Mustang with 4.10 gears which help a lot and then they do a lot of modifications and keep the gears. At this point, the gears are hurting and not helping. BowTie, those numbers don't look right. The E303 should give you power through 6000 rpm and the TFS 351 intake should compliment that. Are those actual dyno numbers or did the builder just give you the numbers? Regardless of where your power ends, anything above 3.55 would be a waste with torque produced by a 358. Unless, of course, you give up a lot of torque for HP through 8000 rpms. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4.10s? vs. 3.73s? | 89fast5oh | Windsor Power | 3 | 12-01-2003 07:39 AM |
97 Snake: 3.55's or 3.73's? | 00'BlackSteed | Modular Madness | 10 | 06-03-2001 12:32 PM |
4.10's vs 3.73's | joey50gt | Windsor Power | 17 | 04-13-2001 04:29 PM |
3.55's or 4.10's? | 93GTDIN | Windsor Power | 17 | 02-23-2001 09:08 PM |
3.55's or 3.73's? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 3 | 01-29-2001 03:19 AM |