

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Procharged!
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 1,539
|
![]() You'll never run 11:1 on 87 octane. I still think you are choking it with the cam, don't go 1.7's get a higher lift cam and go 1.6's they put less stress on the valve trian, I'm sure some others will agree with me. I do agree with Jim go 3:55's the 4:10's will be way to much for the torque of a 351, you just don't need it. If your not planning on running high rpms you don't need the TFS R heads or Intake. Those componets like the high RPMS. Get a set of 185 AFR's and a Holley or Track Heat Upper.
------------------ Check Out My Site 91GT,Holley SysteMAX II Kit-Heads 2.02" x 1.60" port matched to a 1262,Anderson N-61,24#,76mm C&L,Full MAC exhaust 1-5/8" Long tubes,2-1/2" O.R H-Pipe,2 1/2" cat back, No A/C or PS or emissions, 12" K&N Filter,RNH PERFORMANCE Ram Air,Ron Davis Radiator,Full Suspension,S&W 8pt "X" brace,JAZ seats,3:73's,Welds..etc,4:30's and 31 splines coming very soon! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4.10s? vs. 3.73s? | 89fast5oh | Windsor Power | 3 | 12-01-2003 07:39 AM |
97 Snake: 3.55's or 3.73's? | 00'BlackSteed | Modular Madness | 10 | 06-03-2001 12:32 PM |
4.10's vs 3.73's | joey50gt | Windsor Power | 17 | 04-13-2001 04:29 PM |
3.55's or 4.10's? | 93GTDIN | Windsor Power | 17 | 02-23-2001 09:08 PM |
3.55's or 3.73's? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 3 | 01-29-2001 03:19 AM |