

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Altoona, PA
Posts: 336
|
![]() AFR's all the way. With the 351 I would go with the 185's. The AFR is a great street head. In the case of the 165's, the intake runner is small which keeps velocity up, but they flow as well or better than just about every other head out, even ones with 2.02" intake valves and larger intake runners. This way you get great flow and great velocity- just what a street motor needs. The 185's can be a bit much for a 302, but with the added displacement of the 351, the 185's would be a better choice. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that even the 165cc AFR outflows the edelbrock performer RPM. I must say though that the edelbrock heads are great pieces with outstanding quality.
------------------ 95 GT convt' 5 speed, 3.73's,FMS HD clutch, Pro 5.0 shifter, ASP alum. underdrive pulleys, Bassani offroad X pipe, 2 chmbr flowmasters, K&N w/o silencer, edelbrock performer intake, FRPP 65mm T-body, FRPP shorty headers, FRPP aluminum driveshaft.Hooker 4pt chrome car bar, Xenon/Wings West ground effects, custom interior Best ET: 13.83 Best MPH: 98.55mph with Best 60': 1.91 on Nitto DR's Homepage: <A HREF="http://www.angelfire.com/pa2/killercanary" TARGET=_blank>http://www.angelfire |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 10-28-2002 04:57 PM |
Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 0 | 10-27-2002 01:10 AM |
Edelbrock garbage | Stang951 | Windsor Power | 8 | 06-16-2001 08:21 AM |
Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? | gt93mustang | Windsor Power | 14 | 03-06-2001 07:01 PM |