
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 38
|
OK TAs cost about 3000 more than a GT. But your still get 50 horses over the GT. As far as your 2nd and 3rd points I think those are a matter of opinion and couldnt really be made into valid points. I do agree that the new Zs dont look that sporty and I wouldnt buy one but the new TAs, especially with the ram air option? You cant tell me that doesnt look mean. Your 4th point may be correct I dont know I havent really looked into it, but wouldnt it be true that whatever you did to a GT if you did to a TA youd make it faster dollar for dollae since your starting off with a bigger engine?
And for the second response hell yes a bigger engine is going to produce more power. Wouldnt you want a bigger engine so that you had more power? Which gets back to my original point why a GT over a TA? And one more thing: mustangs look like they sit pretty high off the ground for a sports car, I mean they sit about as high as a taurus or car like that does. TAs sit lower. So based on tha law of physics it would seem that a TA would out handle a GT as well as out power it. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 40 reasons FOR gun control | DAN-MAN | Blue Oval Lounge | 22 | 11-13-2002 05:19 PM |
| I love Mustangs | LayanRubr | Blue Oval Lounge | 12 | 08-11-2002 04:39 PM |
| Seatbelt recall 99 mustangs | TechnoVixen | Built Ford Tough | 0 | 06-13-2001 10:33 AM |
