
                    © Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
                    
                  
                MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
| 		
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: palmbayFL 
				
				
					Posts: 184
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 I have a 1990 GT with b303, 1.7s, 70mm TB, pullies, Crane Fireball ignition,  full exhaust, 3.55s and Hoosier Q.T. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	CAR IS LOWERED 1.5 INCHES (doesn't help) My best so far is 13.69@100.3. I'm thinking I have about 260hp and my ETs aren't going to get much better?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Conservative Individualist 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: May 1997 
				Location: Wherever I need to be 
				
				
					Posts: 7,487
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 A 13.7 @ 100 isn't bad for just a B303 cam, 1.7's, pulleys, exhaust, 3.55's, and good tires. I think your guesstimate of approx. 260 HP is accurate.   
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	The 70mm TB is a little large for your stock intake & heads. I would try a 65mm if you plan to keep them both. Problem now is that you have a lot of air going in and out of the engine - which is good - but the stock heads can't utilize it efficiently - which is not good. With some tuning and driving practice you might knock off another tenth or so but yeah, you need to upgrade the cylinder heads/intake to see a real et drop.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: palmbayFL 
				
				
					Posts: 184
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 my thoughts exactly! I need heads and intake but my budget is just to tight. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Would a 65mm TB work better than 70mm?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 I'd rather be basketweaving 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2000 
				Location: Indianapolis 
				
				
					Posts: 2,551
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 I don't think you would notice much of improvement at all by backing down to a 65mm (well atleast not worth the $). 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			If you plan on getting heads/intake in the future just stay with what you have. You actually might pick up a little power if you go back to the stock cam too, then again maybe not. If I were you and if your not planning on heads/intake anytime soon, then I'd try to find someone with a 65mm TB that is looking to go up to a 70mm and just trade them. What brand is your 70mm? 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: palmbayFL 
				
				
					Posts: 184
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 I have the polished Mac 70mm. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Is there any other relatively cheap mods i could do? chip?mass air meter?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 I'd rather be basketweaving 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2000 
				Location: Indianapolis 
				
				
					Posts: 2,551
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 stay away from chips until you get your combo pretty much set and you have a custom one burned to your specs. all the off the shelf chips do is advance timing and you can do that manually. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			I'd invest in a larger MAF and subframe conectors if I were you. You could also do what I did and find a cheap Explorer intake, they're all over the place on Ebay, most of them go for around $200. I noticed a decent gain with mine, its a good N/A intake and really helped after I ported my heads. Good luck 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: palmbayFL 
				
				
					Posts: 184
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Will just an intake help? 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	I found an explorer intake on ebay but they wanted over $300 + shipping. I could get a cobra for that. I found a C&L 76mm MAF for $209  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 I'd rather be basketweaving 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2000 
				Location: Indianapolis 
				
				
					Posts: 2,551
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 yes it will help, just not a WHOLE lot. You should also try to find some used GT40 Iron heads (not the P's) or port the ones you've got.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			The C&L 76mm with the aluminum intake tube looks like a great deal. I think its $209, is that the one your talking about? by the way, what 60ft time did you get with that 13.69, thats a pretty good et for that mph, must have hooked pretty good 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: palmbayFL 
				
				
					Posts: 184
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Yes the C&L 76mm with the aluminum intake tube. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	So you think i should get the C&L? R/T .548 60' 1.938 1/4 13.69 MPH 100.32  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#10 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 1999 
				Location: Utica, Michigan 
				
				
					Posts: 2,631
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Get the meter. It is a huge restriction. You will probably pick up another 1 to 1.5 mph with that alone.  On slicks with a low 1.8 60 ft I bet you would see 13.30's or so. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: palmbayFL 
				
				
					Posts: 184
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 I'm gonna have some serious bottle neck'n go'n on 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#12 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: May 2000 
				Location: Everett, MA 
				
				
					Posts: 417
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Don't waste the money right now, save up for the intake and heads! 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
		
	
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Brake mods ( and other first mods) for a 98 Vert | Chevyguy | Modular Madness | 11 | 09-19-2002 10:03 AM | 
| First Mods | Scrapla | Windsor Power | 10 | 06-09-2002 05:04 PM | 
| Making a fast Street Car = More mods? | MrClean | Windsor Power | 15 | 09-11-2001 04:40 PM | 
| decent gear, decent price? | poopstang | Windsor Power | 12 | 04-17-2001 04:20 PM | 
| Question..Minor mods that wont void warrenty on a 2000GT | Stac | Modular Madness | 5 | 07-14-2000 12:42 PM | 
                    
                  