

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#3 |
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
![]() Vacuum is better for a street car, when cruising at part throttle the timing doesn't advance so you'll get better fuel economy and at part throttle acceleration the curve will advance faster from the change in vacuum, whereas a mechanical advance is controlled by the engine rpm.
For a drag car that doesn't need fuel economy, driveability or part throttle response and spends most of it's time at full advance (3000+ RPM) then mechanical is the way to go. If you do go with vacuum advance, find someone who knows how to re-curve distributors, it's becoming a lost art but it makes a big difference. BTW I'm only 24 and since the mustang mags don't talk much about carb tuning (except for some full blown race motors) I've learned a lot from HOT ROD and from other books about tuning carbs.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vacuum advance still far too aggressive after crane adj unit | crazypete | Windsor Power | 4 | 01-13-2003 12:54 PM |
adjustable vacuum advance | Barry Jackson | Windsor Power | 4 | 12-20-2002 04:59 AM |
Holley Avenger spark advance port sends dizzy off by about 100 degrees advance | crazypete | Windsor Power | 0 | 10-21-2002 10:05 AM |
vacuum advance ??? | jerrys84 | Windsor Power | 2 | 05-23-2002 02:48 PM |
Vacuum advance questions (complicated) | 1985Mustang | Windsor Power | 2 | 03-20-2001 12:39 PM |