
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny, Hot, Sebring, Florida
Posts: 725
|
Those cars your looking at (maybe mine?) are surely running a bit more compression. A stock stang is 9.0:1, mine is roughly 10.75:1.
If you are stock, 93 is the best you can pump, very high octane is for higher compression motors, or power adders cars. Honestly, in my street stang, I run the cheap 87, and am still spankin' high end chevy's, etc. High octane burns slower, thus, smoother, lower octane burns quick, BANG, thus, actually, theoretically, quicker. I am on my 9th Miller Lite though......... ![]()
__________________
Remember...2nd place is 1st place for losers! |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Min Octane for 1999 GT recommended by Ford | Ort | Modular Madness | 3 | 04-08-2004 10:40 AM |
| 87 octane wha??? | Rodoggx | Windsor Power | 14 | 10-26-2003 02:16 AM |
| octane/HP rumors? | gizmo83 | Windsor Power | 48 | 08-23-2002 06:19 PM |
| 110 octane safe? | HellRaiser92 | Blue Oval Lounge | 9 | 03-30-2002 05:38 PM |
| Octane Rating? | Fostang | Windsor Power | 6 | 05-15-2001 03:17 PM |
