
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
|
I never said there was no seat-of-the-pants feel from going to 2.73s to 3.08s. I was just saying that going from 3.73s to 4.10s was just less significant as far the comparison. No one really ponders over whether to go to 3.08s from 2.73s, though.
How much did your e.t. change when you made the switch? ------------------ 351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 4.10s? vs. 3.73s? | 89fast5oh | Windsor Power | 3 | 12-01-2003 07:39 AM |
| 3.73's or 4.10 for a Supercharger? | wantapony2001 | Modular Madness | 5 | 12-18-2002 01:02 AM |
| First Race with 3.73's | 95mustanggt | Stang Stories | 10 | 01-31-2002 02:16 AM |
| 3.73's or 4.10's??? | HiFlow5 0 | Windsor Power | 10 | 09-22-2001 12:21 PM |
| 3.55's, 3.73's Or 4.10's??? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 43 | 03-26-2001 09:41 PM |
