

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Warren, Mi.
Posts: 50
|
![]() The lower intake on a 351W is wider due to the taller deck hieght. If your talking about using your stock 5.0 upper I dont think there is a lower that is compatible for a 351W, but I could be wrong. All the other parts as in injectors, sensors, rails(w/ slight mod. to the hoses), harness,etc. will work. Niether your lower or upper will work. I am running a C4 trans, I think your trans will be fine as long as you keep the HP/TQ level down, but what fun is that?
__________________
91 GT Convertable, 306, TFS TW heads, B41 cam, Holley Systemax, S-Trim, Bassani LT's, and Flo's |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
351w or 347 stroker? which is better? | BLACK85GT | Windsor Power | 55 | 12-21-2002 06:52 PM |
351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
351W in a Fox body | greydan | Windsor Power | 4 | 07-03-2002 02:33 PM |
351W - engine buildup debate inside. Very LONG! | 2FastLX | Windsor Power | 17 | 11-22-2001 11:29 PM |
EFI intakes for a 351W | 84_GT350 | Windsor Power | 3 | 10-04-2001 03:03 PM |