Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
01-12-2001, 11:18 AM
|
#5 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 18
|
What about Comp polymers upper powerbox? That would be about half the price gt40 upper&lower intake costs so that would be an option too. Is the most restrictive part of system that upper intake or is it really recommended to change both of those to gain any fair hp ratings? Those parts costs over 2 times more for me when shipped and taxed than they would cost to you in states so the bang for the buck is really an issue.
Daz ------------------ 95 GT, k&n with removed silencer, dynomax ultra-flo ss mufflers, eibach pro progressive springs |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GT40 vs Stock lower intake difference | ca_mustang | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-02-2004 05:03 PM |
| 351W GT40 Lower intake needed.. | mardyn | Windsor Power | 0 | 01-15-2004 07:03 PM |
| GT40 intake good enough? | 91evilstang | Windsor Power | 8 | 09-02-2001 04:41 PM |
| SN95 MAC Intake Elbow | fastang | Windsor Power | 2 | 08-04-2001 11:33 PM |
| Need some professional advice - head work, valve springs, rockers, cam. pretty long. | AxemanZZ | Windsor Power | 15 | 01-11-2001 01:30 PM |