Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
04-27-2001, 05:50 PM
|
#8 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 193
|
I've owned both althouh my Fox was a Speed Density car. With pullies, off road, flows and a k&n on both cars the Fox went 14.0 with a 2.73 gear. The Sn-95 had the same mods except for a 3.08 gear and it went 14.4. From what I know Speed Density cars ran a little better than Mass Air cars, but my SN-95 had a little better gear and was heavier so I'll call that a wash. As previously stated, the computers suck in SN-95's and the intakes arent the greatest, but it's not hard to get them to go fast.
------------------ 94GT Mac Headers, BBK Off-road H-pipe, ASP Pulleys, Pro 5.0 Shifter, 4.10 Gear, Weld in subs, Flowmaster 2 chambers, NOS 150 shot. Best ET 12.34 @ 110.  |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hey were the 94-95 5.0's faster then the 96-98 4.6's? | 96_4.6 | Blue Oval Lounge | 14 | 05-15-2003 05:43 AM |
| Two 5.0's at the same time and turbo probe smack down. | Dark_5.0 | Stang Stories | 9 | 08-09-2002 09:26 AM |
| 5.0's burning oil?? | MattwantsSpeed | Windsor Power | 8 | 05-27-2002 01:22 AM |
| Icing the Intake on 5.0's.... | 95mustanggt | Stang Stories | 6 | 05-10-2002 09:24 AM |
| V6 Camaros killing 5.0's regularly? | fastang | Stang Stories | 17 | 01-05-2001 10:10 PM |