
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
Pro: Flows better than a stock intake.
Con: Flows better than a stock intake. Pro: $400 is a pretty good price. Con: $400 for what you get isn't all that great. Pro: Building a mild 351 will require a different intake than stock. Con: It will probably require a better intake than the GT40, stock. Pro: You can port intakes for better flow. Con: You cannot port the GT40 upper due to thin castings. Pro: The GT40 intake has long runners that work well for building torque on a small displacement V8 like the 302. Con: The 351 doesn't need that kind of help and the long style runners hurt it's upper rpm performance. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trick Flow intake problems | shacar87 | Windsor Power | 9 | 11-14-2003 05:53 PM |
| New Intake with NITROUS!!!???? | NOSstang08690 | Power Adders | 9 | 09-09-2003 07:05 AM |
| intake | ghostfacedriver | Blue Oval Lounge | 1 | 08-26-2003 07:16 AM |
| stock GT40 head intake runner opening | mak375 | Windsor Power | 2 | 04-07-2003 09:14 PM |
| Head and intake flow. Something to think about. :) | 5ohCOUPE | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-16-2003 08:52 AM |
