
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#29 | ||
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
Quote:
The 351W isn't actually a 351 either. It's a 352. they called it the 351 to avoid confusion with the 352 FE block that was retired. The seat of the pants dyno doesn't work to determine powerbands. Rated hp and torque come in at a lower rpm than the ratings with the 4.6L, but neither engine revs well when stock, and the 4.6L favors the same shift points or lower than the 5.0. Furthermore, it actually took MM&FF more work to get the first Gen 1 GT into the 14's than it did for their first 99 Base Mustang. They were able to muster high 14's out of their stock 94-95GT's without a whole lot of fuss. By the way, I test drove a 95GT and thought it was a complete dog, so I can certainly agree with that. Quote:
The stock 5.0 bottom end is good for 400hp+, and the stock block begins to get iffy at 400-450hp or so. Past 500hp and you're rolling the dice. Add a main girdle, a good rotating assembly and you might be able to run safely for an extended time at 500hp. A well built 347 stroker will put down 400hp at the crank without much problem. A well built 302 will put down 350-375. The weakness in the stock 5.0HO block (including 1986GT) is the main webbing. It's cast thin. The 1986 GT has a .030" thicker casting. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 4.6l Race | PowerSlideGT | Windsor Power | 4 | 05-10-2004 11:13 PM |
| Pinging or knocking in my 2000 GT 4.6L | SoulKeeper | Modular Madness | 15 | 03-31-2003 09:54 AM |
| Please Help!! - 4.6L Prob.s | 98gt5sp | Modular Madness | 2 | 07-09-2002 08:57 AM |
| 5.0L vs 4.6L comparison | tchm | Windsor Power | 3 | 07-22-2001 09:07 PM |
| New 4.6L Tbird, parts? | 91LX2Bfast | Modular Madness | 0 | 10-11-2000 03:54 PM |
