

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#2 |
Mizzou Tigers
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: weston, MO United States
Posts: 1,455
|
![]() They obviously change top speed by lowering it and will most likely cause a decrease in gas mileage. Shifting RPM's may not change, but you will get to those RPM's MUCH quicker.
I have the 3.73 and love them. I also can still get pretty good mileage - 19-20 around town and suburbs, 24-25 on hiways. I have even gotten as high as 29 on the hiway before. I must say though that my transmission is geared a little higher than the stock T-5, so my set up may be a little closer to a 3.55 gear with the stock T-5. I assume you have a T-5 or T-45, in which case you will probably be happy with either the 3.73 or 3.55. Without doubt one of the best bang for you buck performance mods you can make! Enjoy ![]()
__________________
2006 Mustang GT 1990 LX GT-40 motor 262 horsepower, 307ft-lbs (sold but forever loved) 1998 Contour SVT Rice Haters Club Member #244 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3.73's or 4.10 for a Supercharger? | wantapony2001 | Modular Madness | 5 | 12-18-2002 01:02 AM |
First Race with 3.73's | 95mustanggt | Stang Stories | 10 | 01-31-2002 02:16 AM |
New "pathetic" track times after 3.73's !!HELP!! | Dark_5.0 | Stang Stories | 32 | 08-10-2001 09:18 PM |
4.10's vs 3.73's | joey50gt | Windsor Power | 17 | 04-13-2001 04:29 PM |
3.73s coming, any last-minute tips? | 91LXConv | Windsor Power | 11 | 03-29-2001 01:59 PM |