

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() In my opinion, the Fox body is the closest you can get to a modern interpretation of a Muscle Car. I love it for that, and I hate it for that. The Fox is a brute, plain and simple. Little refinement, but it's got a ton of character. Such fun to drive, but it can be a pain to live with day in and day out.
I'm very harsh on the way I rated the two cars. I could have easily given a couple extra points here and there, but I wanted it to be a brutal review without a bunch of candy shoved up people's rears. I have a hunch that the 2002 would take on a much different personality with some simple suspension mods, a better shifter, and some exhaust with a couple cheap engine bolt ons. That's down the road though. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2002 GT Transmission?? | 96Saleen | Modular Madness | 3 | 12-27-2001 02:29 AM |
2002 GT: MP3 player | Craig Detroit | Modular Madness | 4 | 12-21-2001 12:51 AM |
2002 GT V8; Octane rating? | Craig Detroit | Modular Madness | 1 | 12-13-2001 03:12 PM |
2002 Mustang GT? | Cannon | Windsor Power | 3 | 12-11-2001 05:42 PM |
My take on 4.30s in the GT (long). | Mustang92 | Modular Madness | 3 | 10-07-2001 03:09 PM |