

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#16 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() Quote:
If that was the case, nobody would go N/A. You could add 130hp with a 6psi blower for $1800. When's the last time you saw a stock engined 5.0HO with a non-intercooled blower running at 6psi trap 110+? You've just said a 9psi blower is significantly more powerful than a well built EFI 347 stroker engine. A blower just isn't that efficient on a stock engine without an intercooler. Even the manufacturers don't even hint at that kind of power increase from a non-intercooled blower. You're talking power increases that an intercooled turbo would produce. Vortech claims up to 126hp increase at 10psi on an SQ=S trim supercharger. That's 350hp on a stock 5.0. Converted to rwhp, you're looking at 290. The ATI Procharger and Vortech, both being non-intercooled are going to deliver very similar numbers. and Manufacturers like to give the best realistic numbers possible. Making 350rwhp would say that a tuner can squeeze an additional 75hp over the max claims of the manufacturer. That's about 60% more performance increase than what the manufacturer says is possible. With an intercooler, now you're talking maybe. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is stock? | 88workcar | Blue Oval Lounge | 12 | 01-22-2003 09:06 PM |
Stock Tire Sizes | GhettoPop | Windsor Power | 8 | 01-19-2003 07:22 PM |
AFR 165's or other heads with cam and stock induction | Mustang_GT_90 | Windsor Power | 27 | 11-25-2002 03:01 PM |
Suspension ?--Bullitt, Eibach, Stock, or COMBO??? | rel3rd | Windsor Power | 3 | 10-15-2002 07:53 PM |
LT's vs. shorties vs. stock headers | jonnyk | Windsor Power | 9 | 01-01-2001 11:28 AM |