Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
05-14-2001, 02:29 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 1,631
|
If you don't have bumped timing or raised compression, there's no need for anything higher than 89. You might as well save yourself a couple bucks instead of using fuel that could foul your plugs.
------------------ 1984 1/2 GT350 (#842 Hatchback w/ T-tops), 302HO, Comp cams Xtreme Energy cam, Carter 625cfm carb, Weiand Stealth intake, MSD distributor, MSD coil, FMS 9mm wires, 1 5/8" MAC unequal shorties, 2 1/2" MAC Prochamber H-pipe, Flowmaster 2 chambers, KYBs, 16"x8" 4 lug Cobra Rs, Falken 245/45ZR16s |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 87 octane wha??? | Rodoggx | Windsor Power | 14 | 10-26-2003 02:16 AM |
| octane/HP rumors? | gizmo83 | Windsor Power | 48 | 08-23-2002 06:19 PM |
| 110 octane safe? | HellRaiser92 | Blue Oval Lounge | 9 | 03-30-2002 05:38 PM |
| 89 octane vs. 104 or 110 octane | Nitrous Al | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-05-2002 10:12 PM |
| 2002 GT V8; Octane rating? | Craig Detroit | Modular Madness | 1 | 12-13-2001 03:12 PM |