MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-25-2001, 12:17 PM   #1
JD93GT
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Diego, Ca USA
Posts: 52
Post

A common misconception about the 93 5.0 and the 94... the 93 5.0's were rated at 205 hp, while the 92 was rated at 225 hp. Thus causing everyone to think that the 93's were slower, in all actuality, they are pretty much identical. Ford changed the way they measure horsepower in 93, instead of measuring peak hp, they measured average hp, thus the drop. And when the 5.0 ho's came out in 87, they tested them, and then just carried over the stats each year until 93. There were small changes through the years that dropped horsepower, and raised it here and there, and like previously stated, the change from speed density, to maf did account for about a 3 hp drop. And in 94 they rated the 5.0's as 215, partly to help boost sales so that ford could claim that the 94 5.0's were "new and improved." The 94's arent much different than the 93's engine wise, but are heavier, thus slightly less performance.
JD93GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
good deal? saywhenn94 Blue Oval Lounge 5 03-23-2002 11:37 PM
Winter Upgrades??? Check out this deal on tubular a-arms!!! SD Wheeler Stang Stories 3 10-15-2001 07:49 AM
Great deal on tubular a-arms!!!!!! Look!!!!!! SD Wheeler Modular Madness 0 10-14-2001 01:28 PM
SUPER CHIP DEAL RubY Stang Stories 0 01-21-2001 10:32 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.


SEARCH