MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-13-2001, 06:03 PM   #2
MiracleMax
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Hayes, Va, USA
Posts: 798
Post

Well that depends. the biggest benfit from a set of roller rockers are more accurate ratio's vs. the stock rockers. the added benefits are reduced friction and side loads on the valve. As far as the 1.7 vs. 1.6 thing that depends on how well the heads flow. as an example. I believe the stock HO cam has a lift of .444 (with a 1.6). So the lobe lift is 0.2775.

0.2775 x 1.6 = .444
0.2775 x 1.7 = .472
0.2775 x 1.73 = .480

Stock E7TE heads zonk out at .500 lift, so yeah they are worth some power simply due to the fact there is still some flow left in the heads and at the very least you pass the .444 flow mark twice as the valve opens and closes (rather than once with a 1.6 rocker). the flip side of higher rocker arm ratio's. they increase the amount of load on lifter and decrease the RPM potential of the motor. I wanna say that on a brand X motor going from a 1.5 to a 1.6 lowers peak rpm by 300 (as a rule of thumb)
MiracleMax is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roller rockers for stock heads QuantumMotorsports Windsor Power 1 07-14-2003 03:15 PM
Roller Rockers, bad? HiFlow5 0 Windsor Power 1 04-14-2002 01:35 PM
roller rockers bobtodd Windsor Power 4 04-07-2002 01:34 PM
reg rockers or roller rockers?? Chevysucks Windsor Power 1 12-05-2001 08:17 PM
Valve Springs & Roller Rockers StreetStang37 Windsor Power 4 04-17-2001 03:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.


SEARCH