
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 182
|
I will say that the money you spend on that piece could be applied elsewhere. If you calibrate it for factory squirters, you will in escience be replacing the same with the same. You may get the benefit of increased airflow, but nothing that the computer is going to make a good deal of sense of. You best bet is to aim for the mechanicals that make an engine breathe better and then you will use the MAF to tell that computer that the engine DOES BREATHE BETTER. Hold on to the money and go with cam, intake, heads, and then upgrade the electronics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AFR 165's or other heads with cam and stock induction | Mustang_GT_90 | Windsor Power | 27 | 11-25-2002 03:01 PM |
| 351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
| Please Comment of Speed Secret # 2 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 20 | 11-06-2002 11:44 AM |
| Stock 5.0 engine is worth??? | rbatson | Blue Oval Lounge | 10 | 03-06-2001 10:14 AM |
| LT's vs. shorties vs. stock headers | jonnyk | Windsor Power | 9 | 01-01-2001 11:28 AM |
