
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#12 |
|
Dirk Diggler
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: SLOATSBURG, NY
Posts: 1,931
|
yea it is factory five who has that deal but MAC has about the same deal and i have no complaints about mine...just make sure yuor axels tubes are firm into your pumpkin becaue on my last rear they werent and i still got axel hop until one day my drivers side tube ripped right out the mid section..neeedles to say i build another rear and welded the axel tubes to the pumpkin
BTW my vote would be for a box style(MAC) not tubular..tubes are better for sub frames but not for control arms IMO
__________________
95 undecided cubes, AFR 185s,undecided cam, undecided intake, and a 150 hit 89 "turbonotch" 2.3T You might want to hold on..i saw this on a cartoon once |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| lower control arms | jinx6570 | Modular Madness | 4 | 03-07-2003 03:06 AM |
| Trying to change lower control arms | PeTr0 | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-05-2003 09:02 AM |
| granatelli lower control arms are junk! | sn95gt19 | Windsor Power | 9 | 07-02-2002 09:37 AM |
| Rear lower control arms | explicitone | Windsor Power | 5 | 04-24-2002 11:49 AM |
| REAR UPPER AND LOWER CONTROL ARMS | bcinyuz | Windsor Power | 1 | 05-08-2001 04:17 AM |
