More modification, a 95 GT or 95 Cobra

06-17-2001, 09:58 PM

Alright UNIT 5202.... I really didn't think that you would have it in you to be so inaccurate about a subject that you keep throwing at us. I'll try to type slow to help you digest. I owned a 95' cobra for along time, great car, but it's not a whole lot more than a GT, that's all we are saying. First of all, 60 mm TB on the Cobra's except for the 93. GT40 heads and Cobra intake, great. GT intake and heads should be used for a boat anchor. The cam is milder, the difference in HP was made up for in the heads and intake, they made the cam slightly different to give it more bottom end torque from what I understand to compensate for the heads and cam, regardless... On paper, the cam is less aggressive. Straight from my Cobra files and I quote "Lower-Linear rate springs were used in place of the GT's progressive rate units as well as a smaller stabilizer bar" Like the previous poster pointed out, the control arms were slightly stronger, but still stamped for stuff. The sway bar was a 25mm in the front and 27 mm in the rear on the Cobra, not sure on the GT, although I know it is smaller. .530 lift??? Emissions, Hello, that's almost what the "F" cam has. You ever heard a "F" cam? Ever heard a "F" cam car next to a Cobra? You never even know the Cobra was running..

Like I said, the Cobra is great. Mine went 13.00's with bolt ons, never having taken off the intake or valve covers. Just trying to nail down some differences. The Trans is a little stronger in the Cobra too, but it's still a T5! It'll break eventually.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Rare Mustangs....Got One?	1969Mach1	Blue Oval Lounge	22	09-25-2010 04:59 AM
What's the Difference between 95 GT and 95 Cobra	Ron Brooks	Windsor Power	14	05-25-2005 04:43 PM
Mustang Cobra GT	TransAm86	Blue Oval Lounge	4	11-26-2002 04:05 PM
help me decide cobra or GT	ex-lt1-guy	Modular Madness	38	08-06-2002 07:33 PM
94/95 GT vs. 94/95 Cobra Performance	95mustanggt	Blue Oval Lounge	2	03-05-2001 02:45 PM

06-17-2001, 09:58 PM	#13
9Cobra5 Guest Posts: n/a	Alright UNIT 5202.... I really didn't think that you would have it in you to be so inaccurate about a subject that you keep throwing at us. I'll try to type slow to help you digest. I owned a 95' cobra for along time, great car, but it's not a whole lot more than a GT, that's all we are saying. First of all, 60 mm TB on the Cobra's except for the 93. GT40 heads and Cobra intake, great. GT intake and heads should be used for a boat anchor. The cam is milder, the difference in HP was made up for in the heads and intake, they made the cam slightly different to give it more bottom end torque from what I understand to compensate for the heads and cam, regardless... On paper, the cam is less aggressive. Straight from my Cobra files and I quote "Lower-Linear rate springs were used in place of the GT's progressive rate units as well as a smaller stabilizer bar" Like the previous poster pointed out, the control arms were slightly stronger, but still stamped for stuff. The sway bar was a 25mm in the front and 27 mm in the rear on the Cobra, not sure on the GT, although I know it is smaller. .530 lift??? Emissions, Hello, that's almost what the "F" cam has. You ever heard a "F" cam? Ever heard a "F" cam car next to a Cobra? You never even know the Cobra was running.. Like I said, the Cobra is great. Mine went 13.00's with bolt ons, never having taken off the intake or valve covers. Just trying to nail down some differences. The Trans is a little stronger in the Cobra too, but it's still a T5! It'll break eventually.