

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Alright, 65,66 mustangs are roughly 2 inches shorter and 2 inches narrower than the 67-70 mustangs. The 351w will fit in the 65,66 fastback, if your interested go to horsepowertv.com and see if you can buy the tapes where they put a Tremec 5 speed and injected 351w in a 66 fastback. Also if your main concern is going to be handling i would go with the 65, 66 cars, they are the lightest of the vintage mustangs, Fastbacks are about 50-100lbs heavier than the coupes but have better handeling characteristics (reason shelby's are fastbacks), where the 67+ are more muscle cars and built for the big blocks. As for suspension find a local shop that is know for there work, there is a guy in Fontana, Calf. that dose excelent work, he changed the whole front suspension for a friend, all custom fabrication and this thing will keep up with the vetts and vipers. well thats my .02
steven |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is the differences between the 1994-95 5.0 and the 93 and older 5.0 | Raw Power | Windsor Power | 24 | 04-01-2007 05:29 PM |
Happy New Years Everyone | StangFlyer | Blue Oval Lounge | 9 | 01-04-2004 03:19 AM |
Stupid Question? | SilverGT02 | Modular Madness | 4 | 07-06-2002 11:01 AM |
URGENT!! Senate Bill S1766 to call for scrapping of cars 15 years or older | 89FHPLX | Blue Oval Lounge | 13 | 02-09-2002 07:06 PM |
V6 and V8 Differences | MidniteWrider | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 07-11-2001 11:39 AM |