Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
12-06-2002, 03:07 PM
|
#4 |
|
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
I also thought 42 seemed a little high. I'm going to start at 36 and go from there. I'll worry about the vacuum advance once I get the mechanical curve I want. My car has the adjustable vacuum advance so I can change it, I'll adjust it by driving it up a steep hill and see how it behaves.
I think my car does need a fair bit more timing because it seems to be out of where the powerband for this motor should be at the track. I get my best times and MPH by running it up to 6300+ rpms and it bogs out of the hole bad (2.0 60' times on sportsman pros) even with a 4000rpm launch, saying to me there's no torque down low.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Total timing vs initial timing for max HP. | Dark_5.0 | Windsor Power | 35 | 04-28-2009 11:35 PM |
| Total Timing or Computer Timing. What is the deal once and for all! | 89FHPLX | Windsor Power | 21 | 01-29-2002 10:08 PM |
| points and timing specs | xfernal | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 12-30-2001 04:20 PM |
| Initial and total timing for 289? | 69roadrunner | Classic Mustangs | 4 | 12-27-2001 09:34 PM |
| **LARGEST MODULAR RACING PURSE EVER IS RELEASED** | Dave King | Modular Madness | 0 | 04-02-2000 07:45 AM |