Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
12-17-2002, 09:26 AM
|
#11 | |
|
gear banger
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 1,144
|
Quote:
 A 347 which uses a smaller crank journal than a 351 will free up a few ponies right there. Also, the .030 over bore on the 347 will hep the intake flow beter then the 351 with the standerd bore. This will not make huge power gains over the 351, but it will make more And as far as the 351 lasting longer....? I don't agree with that either. If it was a 600hp motor then yes, a 351 is a much stronger block. But if this was a 350-400hp motor, they will last the same.Wade
__________________
79 Hatch: NA 347, Stage 2 Canfield Heads, Victor JR. Intake, Blueprinted Holley 750 HP, Solid Roller Cam, Shooting for 10's on motor 93 LX: Tremec, dual friction clutch, fms flywheel, Hedman shorties, O/R H-pipe Ricer hater's club member #49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 351W EFI in a Fox? | Big-T | Windsor Power | 4 | 12-02-2002 09:43 AM |
| stroker kit for 351W | 79coupe | Windsor Power | 1 | 09-30-2002 10:19 PM |
| 351W Stroker ? | tmmygnn | Windsor Power | 11 | 11-01-2001 07:32 PM |
| Supercharger or stroker for a 351W?? | Stang_ROTY | Windsor Power | 2 | 03-12-2001 03:54 AM |
| HP #'s from a built 351W versus FMS 351 versus stroker | stroker393 | Windsor Power | 0 | 03-09-2001 10:24 AM |