

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Posts: 495
|
![]() A round tube will load more uniform in all directions, but your still gonna have more moment of inertia with a square or retangular tube. As far as stress due to tension this will rely on cross sectional area. i still think you see round tube in roll bars from formablity than from strenghth since the difference between the loading in the variuous shapes is slight. you don't see round bridge beam, building columns or even connecting rods. i don't have my books at the house so I will do some calc's at work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help with subframes | Rocket 99GT | Modular Madness | 1 | 02-13-2002 05:18 PM |
Welding in subframes and removing front sway bar . What should I run?? | Dark_5.0 | Windsor Power | 4 | 10-27-2001 03:06 AM |
Mac Subframes and Control Arms?? | jrfaraci | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-08-2001 07:55 PM |
Round tube subframes for 87-93? | Mad Horse | Windsor Power | 7 | 04-02-2001 09:00 PM |
bolt-on subframes | stanger8172 | Windsor Power | 2 | 02-16-2001 11:47 AM |