Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
03-09-2003, 02:07 AM
|
#7 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Posts: 175
|
I have also personally seen the Typhoon intake. Not crap, BUT not Edelbrock quality either! Edelbrock casts there own intakes, have for what 50 years? They have by far advanced the casting techniques for aluminum intakes more than almost anyone else. They have advanced intake flow technology more than anyone else also. If you are going to work over a intake, port match to the heads ect. and generally screw around with it, then the Typhoon may be the intake for you for the money. As far as out of the box performance/fit/finish the Edelbrock intake is the better bargin, IN MY OPINION!!!!!! Boy I do not want to offend anyone!
__________________
No matter how much you spend, or how much you prepare, there is ALWAYS someone else faster or quicker than YOU!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Typhoon Intake vs Edelbrock Performer RPM | lucheski | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-13-2004 12:54 PM |
| GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
| Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
| Performer RPM vs RPM Air Gap | Phantom5oh | Windsor Power | 17 | 01-10-2002 04:19 PM |
| Performer VS. Performer RPM | IMPULSERACING | Windsor Power | 8 | 02-09-2001 12:45 PM |