Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
05-01-2003, 10:16 PM
|
#5 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blue Springs Mo
Posts: 39
|
Thank you for your opinions guys. I appreciate it. I think as with any engine rebuilds, anything can happen even if you do it yourself. And some machine shops can even take short cuts to make more money. I will probably get one and hopefully it will work well for me. As for the guy above saying he barely pulled over 300 hp. Well that really has nothing to do with the short block. I mean it does but doesn't, it all depends on the heads, cam and intake combo you have. From what I hear, they are just 302's bored .030 over and just strengthened. But they sound good to me. Again thank you for your input
__________________
~(Dustang90)~ |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1968 engine numbers, 289 or 302? | andybud | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 09-11-2003 12:14 PM |
| raced a Supra Twin Turbo | Stang35th | Stang Stories | 63 | 08-23-2003 12:36 AM |
| Rebuilt Engine Problems | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 6 | 05-08-2003 10:19 AM |
| Will the 5.0 become obsolete | vetteeatr | Blue Oval Lounge | 36 | 07-11-2002 08:39 PM |
| Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Racer's Club House | 0 | 05-12-1999 02:27 AM |