

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Mustangs
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,938
|
![]() BowTieEater - I believe the reason they didn't call it a 4.9L instead of a 5.0L is because then people would get it confused with the straight six truck engine. They had the 4.9L, 5.0L, 5.8L, and 7.5?L (460) in the trucks for quite some time and by the time they converted engine sizes from cubic inches to metric Liters there were two very different engines with similar displacement. Plus the "5.0L" was designed to be upscale from the 4.9L so by making the engine size "larger" and designing it with more power than the 300-6 it became a more expensive/"better" option. I believe the 300 straight six started off as a 240ci engine in the sixties, but i'm not sure when they increased the stroke to make it a 300....anyways, At least this is what i THINK they had in mind.
------------------ previous name: 84stangLX '84 Mustang 5.0 LX my LX '89 Mustang GT my GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lx trunk lid??? | 19907up | Windsor Power | 1 | 08-06-2002 02:45 PM |
what to look for buying an lx 5.0 | s-way5.0 | Windsor Power | 5 | 12-23-2001 06:19 PM |
GT to LX how bad is it? | BoveK | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-06-2001 10:48 PM |
LX 5.0 goes down, followed by Accord? hehe | Unit 5302 | Stang Stories | 8 | 02-22-2001 06:16 PM |