MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 11-04-2003, 03:27 PM   #1
Fox Body
Mustang Maniac
 
Fox Body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GA, U.S.A
Posts: 2,266
Post

Jeff, I guess I can understand "a different kind of respect" . But for me, not more or less. Any 10.5 to me is impressive and respect goes out for anyone who had the foursight in planning such a beast.

(I'm not saying anyone is, but...) I don't want anyone to get offended b/c maybe they've put in a lot of hard work to get a N/A mustang running 9s or whatever, I want everyone to understand that I'm not belittling their hard work, but still it all comes down to 1) Preferences, and 2) Money. I will respect anyone who puts tons of hard work into their car (except ricers... ), just don't expect me to give a N/A car owner more respect than a supercharged car owner...........

HotRoddin, Heh, heh....in your illustration, you put a N/A car running 11s with a lawnmower motor against a blown car running 11s with a V8. Of course "finagling" enough horses out of a lawnmower motor would be beyond impressive. . But seriously, you can't just bolt up a blower with 30 lbs of boost (or 350 shot nitrous) to a bone stock 5.0 without blowing up the motor, tranny and drivetrain (and possibly the driver). Moreover, a TON of engineering goes into constructing a well-mad supercharger or unnatural aspiration system, but in most cases, the consumer gets the advantage of bypassing some of that--- yet, that still doesn't reduce the amount of work that went into making and adapting the system. If we're talking about comparing 12 sec N/A car to a 12 sec blown car, yeah, you DO have a point there, but a LOT of planning has to go into building any low 11 or especially faster car and both take a lot of money.

And I totally don't agree that a car that goes 9s blown is equally as impressive as a car that goes 11s N/A But I do agree, yes, it's that element of weight saving that makes the big diff as well.

For me, it's more like what rwhite65 said.

Look at this as well, you get a car running mid 10s N/A with comp of 15:1. Well, compare it to a car running mid 10s blown with a comp of 8.5:1 and 15lbs of boost, which is more "impressive"???
__________________
351W-powered 1979 Ford Mustang Ghia notchback
'79 Video @ Idle
Stock 5.8L under 4" cowl 'glass hood, C4 w/ Transgo shift kit, Holley 750 cfm, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake; Fluidyne Al radiator, Flexalite 175 electric fan, 1 5/8" MAC shorty headers, FRPP Al driveshaft; S&W 6-point cage; 2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters, 8.8" Rear w/ 3.55s; Weld wheels (15x6;15x8), Front: 225/60/15, Rear: 275/50/15 Nitto NT 555R Drag Radials;
14 x 4” K&N X-stream air filter.


'92 GT (5-speed)
Small In Car Video
Stock 5.0L, 2-chamber Flowmasters, MAC CAI, Tri-Ax, Al pedals...

"Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body
Fox Body is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM.


SEARCH