MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Modular Madness
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-07-2003, 09:25 AM   #8
95GTS
Git jiggy
 
95GTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: MO USA
Posts: 865
Cool

Quote:
Originally posted by 96_4.6
Actually I would have to say they made the 96 and up a 4.6 a SOHC to make it more reliable did they not?
Well I think that from a reliability stand point it'll be mostly opinion. From the troubles I had with mine I would surely be one to disagree with the reliability angle. The two motors are different designs though. I think what you might be getting at is that Ford may have been going for a more "efficient" motor. They sure blew it with the 96-98 (heads especially) but the DOHC and the 99-up SOHC are working pretty well. Basically it's just an update of "today's" technology over the older pushrod technology. I don't know that it is REALLY a more efficient motor. Ford is just going to a different technology with their motors.
__________________
1967 Mustang Coupe
95GTS is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raced a 99 GT 5-speed StoplightWarrior Stang Stories 4 05-15-2002 09:13 PM
1988 Gt - 1998 Gt Hp Each Year steedamustang01 Modular Madness 13 05-09-2002 07:26 PM
1996 Cobra vs 2000 Mustang GT Milktasd Stang Stories 2 04-05-2002 03:11 AM
RESULTS - Grand Prix GT vs. Celica GTS 302 LX Eric Stang Stories 7 09-25-2001 06:46 PM
Just got my '89 GT! Time slip guesses? 84stangLX Blue Oval Lounge 6 07-25-2001 09:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.


SEARCH