Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
09-03-2001, 09:54 AM
|
#6 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: middleburg, fl, usa
Posts: 1,134
|
If you have better springs then you might be able to take advantage of the Vic jr. but you really have to turn it hard and you will loose some low-end torque.
I have a friend that was running the vic jr and a 600 dp and we changed his intake to a performer rpm and his car picked up about .3 in the 1/4 mile and has a noticeable amount of more low end torque. The problem he had was that he had the stock springs and the valves would start to float really badly. Also anytime you turn more rpm's you take more of a chance of breaking something and you put more wear and tear on everything. I would stick with a dual plane for now until you get a lot more done to your car. ------------------ James Cox nochevy@hotmail.com 1991 Mustang LX 12.565 @109.38mph 1.764 60ft |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EFI to Carb question | RoushRacing6N17 | Windsor Power | 3 | 12-15-2003 10:59 AM |
| funny carb. question. | 66StangGuy | Classic Mustangs | 0 | 12-29-2002 04:50 AM |
| to carb, or not to carb...this is my question. | black86notch | Windsor Power | 4 | 08-06-2002 08:24 PM |
| '65 Carb Question | Wendell Allen | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 07-13-2002 04:54 AM |
| 90 5.0 EFI to carb question | LX XLR8R | Windsor Power | 4 | 06-01-2001 05:29 PM |