Decision 2004

[rbohm]

Originally posted by Mach 1
Kerry!

I think he did a better job in the debate. Theres somethign about Bush that bothers me, he seems too cocky right now, and seemed to struggle in the debate by repeating the same thing over and over.

dont forget that kerry has honed his debating skills for 20+ years in the senate, bush has been in politics for only 10 years(since he ran for governor of texas). also dont forget that kerry doesnt always mean what he says. bush at least sticks to doing what he says he is going to do. remember that kerry was for the war, then against the war, then for it, but we should have gone to the UN, then against it again, then saying we cant win this war, then saying he has a plan to win the war, with the help of.............france, and germany and russia, and china. in otherwords he is going to try and enlist the aid of everyone who authorized the use of force against saddam, but then refused to get with the program and send troops to help the current US led coalition of 30 countries. the french government has even said that they wont fight in iraq regardless of the circumstances. bush wants a strong US, kerry wants a strong UN. would you rather have france protect US interests? i hope not. i surely dont. i want a strong US military to protect this country. i dont want us to end up like somalia, and a large number of other countries that depend on the UN to take care of them when things go wrong. kerry is wrong for the presidency, as are most of todays democrats(i dont want to see hillary, daschle, gephardt, gore, kennedy, edwards, or dean anywhere near the white house. i could support leiberman for president assuming the republicans cant find anyone who is better suited for the office).