Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
10-28-2004, 09:26 AM
|
#3 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Pigeon Forge Tn
Posts: 611
|
Re: 351W vs 351C
I have to agree with 'Vert, The clev has some performance "pros", most about the heads, the cons outweigh the benefits of going with a windsor though. With the W, you get the cubes without the added weight, and you have a huge aftermarket to work from, and you have the added bonus of being able to convince the "less than knowlegable" that your running a "stock 302".
I think overall the parts selecton and weight savings makes the W a better choice, given the amout of interest, parts and tech out to make it helluafast. If the car was originally a W , I would call that an added bonus that you didnt have to swap anything, and if you use the original engine, the numbers will match  just my .02 J
__________________
____________ '66 Mustang Coupe- AKA "Lenore" *on disability for a (long) bit* '93 GT Mostly stock AKA "Fawkes" Rice Haters Club Member #239 "I find your lack of faith...disturbing." "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats." H. L. Mencken |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 351C vs 351W | stvneil | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-29-2004 10:25 AM |
| 351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
| NEED HELP ASAP !351W to 351C Swap | IeatZ28 | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 11-06-2001 12:45 AM |
| 351W or 351C? | A Wild Neg | Windsor Power | 3 | 04-26-2001 03:35 PM |
| 351W vs 351C | Five0 | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-26-2001 08:18 PM |