

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() From what I've heard and seen, the 4.6s from 96-97's really really really have to run to get 14s from the factory.
MM&FF quoted that it was easier for them to get the 99 V6 they tested into the 14s than it was to get the 96 GT they tested. While there may be a few stock 14sec 96-97GT's (the 98s do run harder) out there, I don't see the accuracy of quoting them as 14sec cars. Quite frankly, the time you have listed is unbelievable from a stock 97GT with your 60ft time. If you cut a 2.0 60ft (entirely possible with a very good driver), you'd have a 13sec stock 97GT. Btw, I'm not calling you a liar at all. If that's what you ran, that's what you ran. I just can't understand or explain the numbers. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Camaro LS1 vs. 4.6 | bowtiered | Modular Madness | 11 | 02-06-2004 11:59 PM |
2004-2005 Camaro 350 H.P!!! | Downshift | Modular Madness | 18 | 06-17-2002 06:46 PM |
Lost to a Camaro | NO SLO PK | Stang Stories | 15 | 04-08-2002 01:26 PM |
FiveOh Convertible runs Big Block Camaro | SidiousV | Stang Stories | 7 | 04-15-2001 11:33 AM |
'66 runs even with LT1 Camaro; annihilates '80's Firebird | Rev | Stang Stories | 1 | 04-01-2001 08:31 PM |