Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
12-16-2004, 02:02 PM
|
#14 |
|
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
Re: stupid head/cam/intake choices LONG POST
I was running 1.7's RR's by the way (that means .544" lift with the 1.7 rockers). With 1.6's there will only be the advertised lift of the cam (1.6's are stock on a ford). The cam you gave specs for is the TFS stage 3 by the way, the stage 2 is 224/232, .542/.563. The 236/248 of duration would probably be trouble with stock pistons-max lift still has nothing to do with it though.
The stage 3 would not work well with the AFR 165's, the flow of the AFR's stops increasing after .550" and the duration would push the powerband of a 302 well beyond what the vavlesprings could effectively control. With the 165's I'd use a Comp XE266HR if I was to use an off the shelf cam.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sum stupid humor. (long) | Pokey 5.0 | Blue Oval Lounge | 11 | 06-13-2003 12:43 PM |
| A Crazy Weekend for the books (Long) | Mercury | Blue Oval Lounge | 9 | 11-05-2002 12:23 AM |
| The other fast and furious post is too long, started a new one | 86LX5liter | Blue Oval Lounge | 7 | 07-03-2001 11:41 PM |
| BBK one-piece flange or MAC individual flange long tube headers. | Fox Body | Windsor Power | 10 | 04-03-2001 04:25 PM |
| Long day! (long post) | Mustang92 | Blue Oval Lounge | 0 | 02-27-2001 07:12 PM |