MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-10-2005, 12:11 AM   #1
bmxmon
Registered Member
 
bmxmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 950
Default Re: 302 vs. 289

Somebody makes those kits, where you switch your front suspension over to the A-arm suspension, i believe, and then they have new sheet metal you can buy, which allows you to cut out your shock towers, and pretty much fit any engine you want in there!! Big money big money big money....................
bmxmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 07:42 AM   #2
k. putman
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Homewood, AL
Posts: 30
Default Re: 302 vs. 289

Both the 289 and 302 have a 4.00 inch bore. And as stated the blocks will interchange.

One difference...the 302 has a deeper bore. Do not read that as longer stroke. The depth on the cylinder wall is longer at the bottom. Why does this matter? For stroker motors there is more skirt support at BDC and thus less piston movement.

Ford measurments for 289 and 302's are 20 3/4 inches tall from pan to valve cover (measured with no intake) and a W is taller at 23 3/4. Width is 18 1/4 inches on the little motors and 21 inches on the W's. They will fit, watch for hood clearence. Back in the day we have put Clevelands in as well with the only problem being some hard to get to plugs.
k. putman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM.


SEARCH